March 13, 2004

Hildago

As with any review, there may be spoilers here, so if you don't want to read about them, skip this entry.

I have to partially agree with Mary Ann of Flick Filosopher on her assessment of Hidalgo: two words: Veeeee-go. I mean, really. The man could stare at a phone book, much less read it, and I could be entertained.

Unlike Mary Ann, the movie felt slow to me, but not in the purposeful force-you-into-the-movie way of an Antonioni, but simply too... over-simplified. And to me, Viggo really has the chops to have taken it to a deeper level, so I have to fault the story.

The story wants to be about a man's inner journey, and there's enough angst and denial-of-his heritage in Frank's life at the beginning of a movie that we feel the promise of something deeper to come. Frank enters the ultimate race of a lifetime -- 3000 miles of desert across Iraq -- and puts his life and that of his beloved horse, Hildago, on the line mostly because he can't stand his world and what he's become. He's been running from himself for his entire life, and this ultimate race is just one more way to run.

The thing is, Frank is already pretty certain about who he is in ways that come across in the story; the way he sits on a horse, the self-assured way he handles all of the taunts from the other racers and bystanders, the way he seems to already know how to run a 3000 mile race across a desert, even though he hasn't run one across a desert before and we don't really see him learning much from anyone around him. He just knows, and that sort of self-assurance doesn't lend itself cinematically to a man discovering himself. (If that makes sense.) So the inner journey that the outer race represents... isn't all that far for him to go. He faces obstacles, he overcomes. He faces more, and overcomes again.

Then, in the middle of this journey story, and to add twists (though someone will probably pipe up that this is real from the real life story)... is the kidnapping and rescue of the Shiek's daughter. It briefly gives Frank the opportunity to say some things out loud about his heritage that he hasn't vocalised yet... and even so, it felt superficial when it should have felt more moving. This is, after all, the most important epiphany of his travels, of his life, and it feels like it emanates off the surface and isn't wrenched from the gut. Even at the point of the climax, when he sees the images surrounding him, when he's at the last leg and giving up? I'm still not sure what it is he's getting from that moment or how it's ultimately playing into the journey of who Frank is and who he will become. The writer has the first racer interrupt him and point out that they are very near the end of the race... which he hadn't been able to see because of his dehydration and exhaustion... which just sucks the power out of those images. I get that he's asking for help and that the help comes... but it comes from serendipity, not from a specific message or guidance from the images, which were what he was calling upon. I wanted to see a moment when the images were beckoning him forward, when something was conveyed to him about who he was as a man, when calling on that heritage paid off for him in a more emotional way. And instead, the competitor stopped on his way to taunt him (thus wakening him up to the fact that he was very close to winning) and the horse that was almost dead a few seconds before stands up and looks miraculously better. And can run like hellfire is about to get it.... while he's dehydrated and couldn't even walk a few minutes before... with a deep gash in a front muscle... while carrying a rider. (I had a horse with a gash not nearly as bad as that -- she was a quarter horse and damned fast, and when she gashed her leg, she was in so much pain, she was practically in a stupor. It took her weeks to get back up to the point where she could walk without wincing and longer to carry a rider. And I weighed less than a 100 lbs.)

Even with all of that complaining, I still enjoyed the film, but it was mostly because like I said, Veeee-go, and then, there are horses. I love horses and I will watch almost any film where they are prominent. (One of my favorite films is a coming of age story, THE MAN FROM SNOWY RIVER. I know, half of you just rolled your eyes, but I love that movie and if you don't like it, there is something wrong with you. Seriously. Wrong. So there.)

Posted by toni at March 13, 2004 10:30 PM
Comments

I too loved the movie!!! and Veeeeeee, but I have a friend who said he watched the documentary on the cable and he said none of this ever happened in real life. Do you have any facts for me? I would love to prove this guy wrong !!!

Kay

Posted by: kay at March 21, 2004 11:15 AM

I wish I did have some of the facts -- the movie made me interested enough in the story to want to do some research. I may see what's out in the library here.

I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that a vast majority of the things which happened in the film were fabricated. Hollywood uses "based on a true story" pretty loosely -- if they've got the person's name right and the ultimate outcome, they tend to create the drama they need for a film structure out of what they have (meaning, they may shorten or combine events to give a better narrative flow for a 2 hour story). I think it was Gary Ross who adapted Seabiscuit who recently said that if he had put in every interesting event from the book into the film, he'd have had a 7 hour movie. So your friend is probably right.

Posted by: toni at March 22, 2004 09:31 PM

There was an article about this movie recently in Outside magazine. Turns out that the guy who the movie is based on was lying about the whole thing. He lied about several races, and this was his biggest. In the article, it explains how he just held a normal job, and was looking for excitement. He lied about the whole race. The writers of the article doubted whether there was actually a race that lasted three thousand miles in the middle east.

Posted by: Tyler at April 1, 2004 10:37 AM

That's interesting to hear -- thanks! I'll go see if I can find that article; sounds like something I'd like to read.

Posted by: toni at April 1, 2004 11:41 AM

As a member of the Buffalo Bill Historical Society I receive thier magazine, Points West, and in the last issue they were outraged that Hollywood spent months having them research Frank Hoskins only to have NOTHING turn up in their tons of documents, payroll, posters, everything relating to Buffalo Bill and then have all the negitive research ignored by the producers who continued to sell the story as true. I've seen the movie twice and love it even with all it's faults. It would have been just as beautifully filmed and told as fiction as opposed to "based on fact".

Posted by: Cindy at May 8, 2004 07:56 PM

Very interesting! I saw the movie last night and enjoyed it, but I doubted it was based on the truth. I do believe that there is a race in Arabia, but I doubt it's 3000 miles. There were definately some echoes of what I would consider authentic touches (bloodlines book and the discussion of the purity of the horses) but the story of a cowboy on a mustang just doesn't ring true...especially that last part when the half dead horse gets up and wins the race! But still a very enjoyable movie...lol...I like Star wars just as much!

Posted by: Nancy at May 30, 2004 08:12 AM

I was the movie on Monday, June 7. I loved it, but then again anything that shows the power and "showmanship" of horses will draw me to a movie. Based on a true story? I'm not too sure about that. The part at the end about the horses preserved in Bluejack, Oklahoma I am researching. I was raised in Oklahoma and this was new to me. My Dad was an Oklahoma historian and I don't remember him ever mentioning anything about the horses. But, whether the movie is based on a "true story" or not doesn't take away the enjoyment of the film.

Posted by: Jane at June 9, 2004 10:15 AM

Loved the movie, look at the BLM website they auction horses out of Blackjack Oklahoma all the time. Appears their was a documentary on tv that states the hildago breed is held on private land and not for auction. How can this be false when they have photos of Frank H. on his horse. Confused. However I loved the movie. Wish their were more like it

Posted by: Elaine at August 27, 2004 08:35 PM

yes kay i have some facts for you and yes the moie is based on a real story if you look up the Frank T. Hopkins you will find a lot more then the man you have been listening to! i have a mustang just like hildalgo and so i looked up a lot of info about Mr. Hopkins and the movie and the movie is based on a TRUE story so now you can prove your friend WRONG!!!

Posted by: Jessica at December 27, 2004 02:06 PM